Business Daily Media

Business News

Our states are crying poor. They wouldn't if they charged for rezoning like the ACT

Throughout Australia, when land is rezoned from industrial to high-rise residential, a charge is levied to help fund the required infrastructure.

In NSW it is called an infrastructure contribution[1].

The NSW government is reviewing it[2] in order to cut “red tape[3]” and “fix the uncertainty[4]”.

They are words that ought to set off alarm bells. Queensland tells us how it is likely to play out.

A decade ago Queensland developers complained that a similar system lacked transparency[5] and was not proportional to underlying infrastructure needs[6]. So the Queensland government fixed it by by requiring each council to publish a standard schedule[7] of charges based on estimated infrastructure costs.

Problem solved. Right?

No, as it happens. In 2011 the Queensland Premier suddenly announced[8] a cap on charges. Overnight the system was disbanded and replaced with a fixed charge statewide.

Developers want lower infrastructure charges

The reality was that developers didn’t just want certainty and transparency, and they weren’t particularly keen on proportionality. They wanted lower charges.

In Victoria the property lobby is arguing for lower charges directly[9], without going through the charade about wanting less uncertainty and red tape.

To see the value of lower charges for developers, consider that current contributions in NSW are usually in the range of A$20,000 to A$70,000 per new apartment.

Read more: Four ways we can clean up corruption in land rezoning[10]

If a $50,000 charge was halved, for example, it would create a $2.5 million windfall for the owner of a site who developed 100 apartments. Add that up across all the sites owned by developers and it comes to billions.

Yet they are enriched by rezoning

It’s not as if developers can’t afford what’s charged. The moment their properties are rezoned they make much, much more.

Here’s an example.

A well-situated industrial site in Sydney’s inner west was bought for $8.5 million, rezoned high density residential, then sold again for $48.5 million[11]. The 470% windfall[12] was the result of a government decision: rezoning.

Our states are crying poor. They wouldn't if they charged for rezoning like the ACT The rezoned site of the Lewisham Estates in Sydney’s inner west. Inner West Council[13]

Not only are these windfalls enormous, they can add to the cost of infrastructure.

An industrial site in Altona North in Melbourne was bought by a developer for $8.7 million, rezoned for “comprehensive development” and then compulsorily acquired by the Victorian government for the West Gate Tunnel project for $22.5 million[14].

The Altona North rezoning added $14 million to the cost of the tunnel.

Our states are crying poor. They wouldn't if they charged for rezoning like the ACT Rezoned industrial land in Altona North. The Age[15]

Why not charge for rezoning?

The simplest way to fund council infrastructure would be to remove all fees and charges and sell the property rights granted through rezoning at market prices.

It could raise eight times what infrastructure charges do.

We know it can be done because the Australian Capital Territory has been doing it since 1971, charging 75%[16] of the market price for new property rights granted through rezoning.

Read more: Property developers pay developer charges, that’s why they argue against them[17]

In Sao Paulo, Brazil, the rights to develop to at higher densities have to be bought from the government at auction[18].

Developers won’t like it. Yet it would give them what they say they want, which is certainty. More than anyone else, they are acutely aware of what rezoning does to the value of their properties.


  1. ^ infrastructure contribution (
  2. ^ reviewing it (
  3. ^ red tape (
  4. ^ fix the uncertainty (
  5. ^ lacked transparency (
  6. ^ not proportional to underlying infrastructure needs (
  7. ^ standard schedule (
  8. ^ suddenly announced (
  9. ^ directly (
  10. ^ Four ways we can clean up corruption in land rezoning (
  11. ^ $48.5 million (
  12. ^ 470% windfall (
  13. ^ Inner West Council (
  14. ^ $22.5 million (
  15. ^ The Age (
  16. ^ 75% (
  17. ^ Property developers pay developer charges, that’s why they argue against them (
  18. ^ at auction (

Authors: Cameron Murray, Research Fellow - Henry Halloran Trust, University of Sydney

Read more

Business Daily Media Business Development

Celebrating Australia’s innovative, evolving and ‘loved’ local business community

Australia is a nation famous for local businesses. From the tip of Tasmania to the top of Darwin, and from the East coast to the West, retailers and mechanics, dentists and tradies are p...

Dave Scheine, Country Manager Australia at Podium - avatar Dave Scheine, Country Manager Australia at Podium

3 Things You Can Do To Reduce Workplace Injuries From Happening With Your Staff

So many businesses are more busy now than they have been in the last few years. But with issues with staffing and supply chain problems slowing things down, it’s vital that you as a bu...

Business Daily Media - avatar Business Daily Media

Wonders in The Whitsundays

TRAVEL DEALS   Stay for 3, Pay for 2 in Airlie Beach  Extend your holidays and treat yourself to the ultimate resort experience in February and March. Choose from fully self-contain...

Jasmine Halley - avatar Jasmine Halley

Icon Agency wins Large Agency of the Year at the 2021 GTA awards

Integrated Melbourne agency Icon has taken top honours at the 2021 Public Relations Institute of Australia (PRIA) Golden Target Awards, bringing home Gold as the Large Agency of the Year...

Business Daily Media - avatar Business Daily Media

Writers Wanted

Content & Technology Connecting Global Audiences

More Information - Less Opinion