One of the reasons why some companies fail in their expansions, whether ANZ in Asia, or Starbucks and Woolworths in Australia, is that their business models don’t sufficiently account for differences in consumers’ habits.
Research shows that over time consumers build up habits. These habits influence what people buy, when and where. For example, in a study of transport options one of the biggest predictors of whether people chose to drive was how much of a habit driving had been.
That is why simply copying and pasting what works in one location (such as a huge hardware warehouse) without adjusting for local circumstances (different competitors, services and customer preferences) is very risky.
Australian hardware chain Bunnings is just one example of a company struggling to cope with entrenched customer habits, as more than A$1 billion has been written off its recent expansion into the United Kingdom.
Does the business model suit the context?
Wesfarmers could be forgiven for thinking that the UK market was a fit with its existing Bunnings business model. After all, at least according to one measure, there are only minor differences between the culture of the UK and Australia.
But culture is just one factor that influences consumer behaviour. In the UK, Bunnings also faces greater competition from established rivals, such as the trade-oriented hardware chain Travis Perkins and the retail-oriented B&Q.
More than affecting how much power Bunnings has to set prices, these rivals will also command the loyalty of a sizeable amount of shoppers. There are existing habits in this market – shoppers will default to certain stores for certain products, or at certain times. These habits are ingrained and difficult for a new entrant to change.
There is an idea in psychology called Dual Processing Theory that says humans have two ways of processing information. One is fast, easy and automatic; the other is slow, effortful and deliberate.
Tradies, for example, could be used to going to their local Travis Perkins for a bag of cement. Retail shoppers might frequent B&Q for some pavers or nails on a Saturday afternoon. In other words, Bunning’s potential UK customers already have shopping habits that work against Bunnings.
This is also bad for Bunnings’ existing UK customers – the ones who frequented Homebase before Bunnings bought it. Homebase customers would have also had habits and mental shortcuts – to go to Homebase for certain product ranges like kitchens, or sub-brands like Laura Ashley.
These are not part of Bunnings’ business model of focusing on a wide range of hardware at low prices.
So, both their existing customer base and potential customer base have shopping habits that Bunnings has struggled to profitably change.
The question now facing Bunnings is what to do. Changing habits is very difficult, as Starbucks discovered when it tried to crack the Australian market earlier in the century, or when Woolworths tried to create a clone of Bunnings.
One way to break customer habit is to either intervene when their environment is changing, such as when they are moving house, or to change the environment on them such as re-setting price expectations on frequently shopped items. But this is hard to do. The very creation of a habit reorients our thinking, making us less attentive to new information and courses of action.
Unfortunately, it looks like the power of habit might just mean curtains for Bunnings UK.
- ^ ANZ in Asia (www.afr.com)
- ^ Starbucks (www.abc.net.au)
- ^ Woolworths (www.woolworthsgroup.com.au)
- ^ Research (www.tandfonline.com)
- ^ study of transport options (journals.sagepub.com)
- ^ Bunnings – a game of clones (theconversation.com)
- ^ more than A$1 billion has been written off (www.theaustralian.com.au)
- ^ purchased (www.wesfarmers.com.au)
- ^ according to one measure (www.hofstede-insights.com)
- ^ substituting (daily.unitedlanguagegroup.com)
- ^ Travis Perkins (www.travisperkins.co.uk)
- ^ B&Q (www.diy.com)
- ^ Dual Processing Theory (books.google.com.au)
- ^ One (books.google.com.au)
- ^ rely on the first way (www.sciencedirect.com)
- ^ Masters was spoiled from the start, now Woolworths must go back to basics (theconversation.com)
- ^ like kitchens (www.theguardian.com)
- ^ put it (www.theguardian.com)
- ^ it is difficult (www.tandfonline.com)
- ^ as Starbucks discovered (www.abc.net.au)
- ^ tried to create a clone of Bunnings (www.abc.net.au)
- ^ hard to do (www.tandfonline.com)
- ^ hurting profitability (www.news.com.au)
Authors: Conor Wynn, PhD Candidate at BehaviourWorks, Monash Sustainable Development Institute, Monash University