Where exactly a spacecraft might land in Australia is still anyone’s guess.
But the UK Space Agency’s well-developed plans to build Europe’s first spaceport in Cornwall, southwest England, as well as another to launch rockets carrying micro-satellites in Sutherland, north Scotland, shows the Australian venture has a lot more groundwork to do.
But right now, it could be argued, it has a large problem: How will Australia connect to the rest of the international space economy?
Focused on old friends
Before the Australian Space Agency was founded, Australia’s main international relations regarding outer space were with the United States and some European countries. It has long hosted ground stations for NASA and the European Space Agency.
It has cooperated with other international partners to a lesser extent. The most notable project is the Square Kilometre Array, an astronomy project being built in Australia and South Africa. International partners include Canada, China, India and New Zealand.EPA/Skatelscope
The Australian Space Agency has been talking to NASA about cooperation, including on NASA’s Lunar Gateway effort to build a permanent presence on the Moon. It has signed statements of strategic intent with Boeing and Lockheed Martin, two large American aerospace firms that are NASA contractors. A private northern Australian rocket launch company reports it is negotiating to launch NASA sounding rockets next year.
The US communications firm Viasat plans to build a ground station near Alice Springs. American universities are the only foreign partners of Australia’s newly opened CubeSat and unmanned aerial vehicle research centre, CUAVA.
With the Europeans, the Australian Space Agency has signed memoranda of understanding with France and Britain. The Italian space company SITAEL has expanded to Adelaide, where the Australian Space Agency is based. The federal government’s new SmartSat cooperative research centre has a consortium of nearly 100 industry and research partners. One is the European aerospace giant Airbus, with which the Australian Space Agency has also signed a statement of strategic intent.
These are still early days, but outside of partnerships with the Americans and Europeans, the only major international developments since the Australian Space Agency’s founding are with Canada and the United Arab Emirates.
Ties with China and India
So should Australia diversify its relations?
On the one hand, tying Australia’s space economy to the Americans and Europeans makes sense. Both have large markets and developed space industries. Close ties to both will likely ensure a steady stream of business.
On the other hand, there are benefits to pursuing a new type of multilateralism that is less US- or Euro-centric.
Through the Square Kilometre Array project, Australia has links with China and India. Compared to the Americans and Europeans, these two countries have different competitive strengths in the global space industry.
Positioning between them could put Australia in a unique place in the global production networks of space science and technology. This is particularly so if relations between some of these larger players are distant (the United States and China, for example). Australia could benefit from being a go-between.
Australia could also choose to supplement these larger relationships with ties to smaller countries. Especially with other new entrants into the space economy – New Zealand established a space agency in 2016, for example – there are common points of interest.
All are likely to want to diversify relationships with big space powers and not be pushed into dealing with just one or another. Again, friction between the United States and China comes to mind. Smaller space powers could band together to maintain their ability to make their own independent decisions.
There is no right answer about how Australia should proceed with international engagement in the space economy. More accurately, there are different right answers depending on what sort of space power Australia ultimately wants to become.
Australia’s space agency is just one year old. The country does not need to automatically continue its Western orientation. It can instead recreate itself as a truly international actor in the new space economy.
- ^ 90 minutes (www.9news.com.au)
- ^ private space companies (www.bbc.com)
- ^ Ten essential reads to catch up on Australian Space Agency news (theconversation.com)
- ^ Australian Space Agency (www.abc.net.au)
- ^ NASA (www.cdscc.nasa.gov)
- ^ European Space Agency (www.esa.int)
- ^ open doors internationally (www.industry.gov.au)
- ^ Lunar Gateway (www.politico.com)
- ^ Boeing (www.industry.gov.au)
- ^ Lockheed Martin (www.industry.gov.au)
- ^ reports it is negotiating (www.smh.com.au)
- ^ NASA and space tourists might be in our future but first we need to decide who can launch from Australia (theconversation.com)
- ^ Viasat (www.theaustralian.com.au)
- ^ foreign partners (www.cuava.com.au)
- ^ France (www.theaustralian.com.au)
- ^ Britain (assets.publishing.service.gov.uk)
- ^ SITAEL (www.sitael.com)
- ^ Airbus (www.spaceconnectonline.com.au)
- ^ Canada (www.industry.gov.au)
- ^ United Arab Emirates (spacewatch.global)
- ^ To carve out a niche in space industries, Australia should focus on microgravity research rockets (theconversation.com)
- ^ space agency (www.mbie.govt.nz)
Authors: Nicholas Borroz, PhD candidate in international business and comparative political economy, University of Auckland