Business Daily Media

Australia should steer clear of the sanction fight between the US and China

  • Written by Bruce Baer Arnold, Assistant Professor, School of Law, University of Canberra

Even though Australia follows the United States in much of its policy, Australian exporters and consumers will be hoping we don’t get caught in the crossfire as the US and China impose sanctions on each other.

US President Donald Trump has the power to impose trade sanctions[1] on China for its disregard of US intellectual property (IP) rights: patents, trademarks and copyright.

These sanctions could make Chinese exports more expensive or prevent access to the US market. China has already indicated[2] it will play tit for tat, imposing its own sanctions.

Read more: Trump's $60 billion in China tariffs will create more problems than they solve[3]

Trade disputes are often as much about rhetoric as about reality. China will remind the world that the US began as a pirate nation, harvesting European technological innovation and cultural production[4] (such as work by Byron, Shelley, Dickens[5] and Trollope) on the basis that it was a developing nation and because it could.

Away from the headlines China will likely take the US to the World Trade Organisation (WTO[6]), a global mechanism for resolution[7] of trade disputes. The US has announced it will take China to the WTO over patent violations.

The US will presumably ramp up claims with the WTO against other trading partners (such as India, Indonesia, Thailand and members of the European Union) that appear on its watch list[8] for allegedly pirating US knowhow.

What this means for Australia

Academics such as Matthew Rimmer[9] have astutely highlighted[10] disadvantages for Australian consumers as citizens of an IP colony[11]. This is where we import more than we export in content and pay a premium for work from overseas.

For example, we pay more[12] than our US counterparts for software and hardware that most people take for granted. Our IP regime – in principle and practice – construes many violations of IP rights as piracy.

Our regime is aligned with that of the US. That reflects our traditional defence policy and the significance of US investment. What is good for US companies Microsoft, Pfizer and Disney is deemed to be good for Australia.

But joining in this cascade of retaliation will jeopardise economic growth, foster political unrest in developing economies and penalise consumers. The salient feature of economic growth over the past four decades has been globalisation – trade and investment across borders – rather that fundamental productivity gains through information technology[13].

Integration with the global economy (alongside the hollowing-out of local manufacturing and the TAFE system) mean that we cannot turn back the clock to the days of Alfred Deakin. Deakin’s grand compromise – the Australian Settlement[14] – promised to protect small farmers, local manufacturers and workers behind walls that restricted migration and imports.

The headline-grabbling sanctions from Trump might also not necessarily be supported. Some business leaders recognise[15] the importance of trade across the global economy and are perplexed by the current policy that seems to be driven by Trump’s late-night tweeting rather than anything coherent.

Where does that leave China?

China’s response has so far been cool[16]. Moderation in the public arena highlights the idiosyncratic nature of Trump’s statements. It also reflects a deeper reality.

China wants to sell high-technology products to Australia, the US and other nations. One is example is 5G telecommunication networks from Huawei[17].

It wants the advantages that come from exploitation of the global IP regime, with its innovators and entrepreneurs building portfolios of patents and buying leading Western brands. It is likely[18] to emulate what we saw with Japan: from “pirate” to IP citizen, complying with laws, within a few decades.

Read more: Made in China: three ways Chinese business has evolved from imitation to innovation[19]

Beijing is slowly strengthening the enforcement of IP rules in key regions such as China’s Pearl River Delta. In part that’s an effort to reduce the backlash in its export markets and it’s also a recognition that growth may be a matter of fostering innovation rather than copying or cheap labour.

Australia sources many manufactured items from China, with that production often dependent on US, Japanese and EU IP. Our own economy depends on exports of commodities; universities are dependent on overseas (particularly Chinese) students. So we don’t want to see an increase in international tensions and don’t want a slowing of the global economy because of a cascade of tit-for-tat sanctions.

References

  1. ^ trade sanctions (www.whitehouse.gov)
  2. ^ indicated (www.seattletimes.com)
  3. ^ Trump's $60 billion in China tariffs will create more problems than they solve (theconversation.com)
  4. ^ cultural production (press.princeton.edu)
  5. ^ Dickens (www.charlesdickensinfo.com)
  6. ^ WTO (www.wto.org)
  7. ^ resolution (www.wto.org)
  8. ^ watch list (ustr.gov)
  9. ^ Rimmer (papers.ssrn.com)
  10. ^ highlighted (theconversation.com)
  11. ^ IP colony (theconversation.com)
  12. ^ pay more (www.aph.gov.au)
  13. ^ information technology (www.aeaweb.org)
  14. ^ Australian Settlement (theconversation.com)
  15. ^ recognise (www.wsj.com)
  16. ^ been cool (www.seattletimes.com)
  17. ^ Huawei (www.afr.com)
  18. ^ likely (www.foreignaffairs.com)
  19. ^ Made in China: three ways Chinese business has evolved from imitation to innovation (theconversation.com)

Authors: Bruce Baer Arnold, Assistant Professor, School of Law, University of Canberra

Read more http://theconversation.com/australia-should-steer-clear-of-the-sanction-fight-between-the-us-and-china-93856

Business Reports

EOFY explainer: Everything your business needs to know about the instant asset write-off

Australia has long been renowned as a rich and vibrant small business nation, where entrepreneurialism is encouraged and celebrated. It has, however, been a challenging period for small business owners, and the transition from o...

Brand Expert Shines in Business Awards

Sydney multipreneur Zahrina Robertson, who is known for producing world-class visual assets, has been named a finalist in the North Shore Local Business Awards. The founder of Zahrina Photography & Video[zahrinaphotograph...

New Image acquires Nutrimetics from Tupperware Brands

New Image Group has acquired skincare and cosmetics brand Nutrimetics from Tupperware Brands Corporation (NYSE: TUP) for an undisclosed sum. Nutrimetics is a natural fit with New Image’s portfolio of health and nutrition prod...

Save, spend or invest? New offering allows Aussies to maximise their savings

With the turn of a new financial year, Australians are at a loss of how to make the most of their tax refunds this year with rising costs of living and low return on savings. The Australian Investor Sentiment Report 2022 reve...

Commercial Painting Revitalised Shop Fronts and The Economy – Why Did the Funding Dry Up?

State governments provided retailers with grants to revitalise their shop fronts in a bid to help the ailing industry. The $2000 - $10000 grant aims to ‘add a lick of paint” and some street appeal to retail outlets not onl...

How to Succeed as a Call Center

If you aspire to build a productive and prosperous call center, you need to begin from the zenith or top. After all, your workforce won’t be able to create a positive experience for your customers if they’re not managed pr...

Web Busters - Break into local search

WebBusters.com.au